Article # 1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050919305393
Critical Thoughts What do the findings / argument / conclusions cover that are different from what you want to explore? Make note of the strengths and weaknesses of this paper (in your view). Is this paper adequate to answer your research question? If not, why not? How does it differ from the earlier and subsequent articles published in this area? (500 words) This paper highlights … but fails to consider… The assumptions/focus/sample fails to account for … Later research in this area from [Article #2] has improved on this paper by…
Article # 2 https://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/12076
Leave a Reply