Watch the attached lecture and read the 2 attached readings.
Write a 600-word r
Watch the attached lecture and read the 2 attached readings. Write a 600-word reflection on your major thoughts, questions, and concerns resulting from the lecture video and your chosen readings. Be sure to identify two ethical concepts you learned about (for example, the difference between ethical fundamentalism and ethical relativism).
Based on chapter 3 reading, think of these questionsExplain the authors’ analysis of cheating.
Do you agree with the argument that sometimes cheating in sport may be morally acceptable? How do the authors evaluate that claim?
What is James Keating’s analysis of sportsmanship? Explain one criticism of it.
Do you think strategic fouling sometimes is morally acceptable? Defend your view by considering one criticism of it.
Do you think beneficiaries of egregiously bad calls in close contests should accept a resulting victory? How would you apply your analysis to the case of the fifth down and the different reactions to it by the University of Colorado and Cornell, as described in the text?
Based on chapter 7 reading think of these questions
What is the basic tenet of the Corruption Thesis?
Is there a need to protect sport from market values? Why?
Explain and exemplify the internal and external goods of sport.
What are the main responsibilities of the sports industry?
Can you think of an example in which market values advanced the values internal to sport and the mutual quest for excellence through challenge?
Leave a Reply